[Dragaera] Vlad vs Dumbledore

[Eugene Zaretskiy]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Kenneth Gorelick <pulmon at me.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Eugene Zaretskiy <eugene.zar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Maximilian Wilson
> <wilson.max at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Eugene Zaretskiy <eugene.zar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> But, really, it's just a popularity contest, because:
>
> * Phoenix Stone. Knife to the eye. Vlad wins.
>
> Why would Phoenix Stone have any effect on Potterverse wizardry? It's
>
> not amorphia-based.
>
> Why not? I don't recall there being much of an explanation of the
> source of magic in Rowling's books. But even if the Phoenix stone is
> useless, Vlad's pretty resourceful.
>
> Besides, the timeline of these cage matches bugs me (well, not
> really). Jaime Lannister is missing his hand (it's listed as a
> disadvantage) so I guess they are taking the Jaime from the latest
> GRRM book. And yet, there are none of the obvious disadvantages a
> current-book Dumbledore would have. The odds are really stacked
> against poor Vlad! At least pitting GRRM against Rowling as a
> popularity contest is somewhat poetic. SKZB vs Rowling is,
> unfortunately, needless slaughter. Also, why does she get TWO?
> Possibly more, I have yet to actually see the main character from her
> books...
>
>
> -Max
>
>
> Spoiler Alert
>
> Dumbledore is dead. So, when Vlad takes him on, is he undead?  Not that it's
> a problem for Vlad, but one should know. Can LT/GS kill the undead?

This brings us back to the discussion of undead, heh. I don't there's
been any evidence to suggest the undead lack souls.

-- 
Eugene Z
http://blog.eugenez.net