[Dragaera] Is Kelly foolish?
Jerry Friedman
jerry_friedman at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 24 08:44:25 PDT 2010
Louis Eastman wrote:
> So, Kelly's plan is to unify Easterners and Teckla against pretty much
> everyone else. He definitely has the advantage of numbers...but he speaks of
> forcing the Imperium to do things, while also speaking encouraging armed
> resistance like the shutdown of South Adrilinkha. What I don't understand is
> how he expects to win.
> For one thing, he assumes the vast majority of the populace will willing
> join him, which seems...optimistic. And ultimately it doesn't seem like he
> has an answer to the fact that the Empire, which has only one ranged weapon
> commonly available for the regular footsoldier, has a monopoly on sorcery,
I don't think it does. Easterners and Teckla can do some sorcery (which Paresh
makes a point of, as I recall).
> in addition to the fact that they face Pre-Empire sorcery AND the Orb. So
> while Kelly has the masses, the Empire has the equivalents of artillery/gun
> emplacements which negate that.
Is it clear that sorcery and the Orb (to whatever extent it isn't the same as
sorcery) and even pre-Empire sorcery can be the equivalents of artillery and gun
emplacements?
If Paarfi's description of Morrolan's expedition against Tri'nagore is anything
like correct, Morrolan probably can't be overwhelmed by numbers as long as he
can stay awake. Quite possibly neither can Aliera or Sethra. But maybe that's
not true of anyone else. And the three of them can't guard the whole Imperial
Palace.
> This makes me wonder exactly what his long term plans are. Does he expect
> the some of the nobility will join him?
Maybe. It's happened in reality, but I suspect that's partly because of moral
ideas (human rights, the golden rule) that seem to be unknown or at least not
explicitly in people's minds in the Empire.
> Or that he can outfight sorcery with witchcraft?
Maybe at least neutralize it enough to get the advantage of numbers to tell.
> That the Teckla/Easterners won't break after a few massive defeats?
I believe revolutions have happened after massive defeats.
Vlad heard that the rebels were winning until the sailors on the Whitecrest
withdrew their support. (I wonder why, beside plot necessities.) I'd assume
they were Orca, so maybe "common" Orca are likely to join a revolution. And
apparently in Steven's world, such a rebellion can come close enough to success
that hope wasn't foolish, and the next one would have a chance of succeeding.
You mentioned the long term. Kelly is probably partly thinking about the real
long term. In this fictional world, Marxism is the truth. History inevitably
tends toward a revolution that will bring about a socialism far better than
anything the world has ever seen.
However, as Ken Koester said, Kelly's world isn't ready for it. Verra says that
and Steven confirmed it here some years ago. Another part of Marxian historical
inevitability is that socialism arises from industrial capitalism. The Empire
is just feeling its way toward that. So if Kelly's imagining a dictatorship of
the proletariat in his or even Morrolan's lifetime, he doesn't have good reason
for it.
On the other hand, what should someone do in a country that's not ready for a
communist revolution? Probably the Marxist answer is: do everything you can to
bring it about anyway. Ultimately you're on the side of history, your actions
will be moral, and I'll bet Marxists believe they'll somehow work out for
the best. E.g., provoking brutal retaliation from the rulers radicalizes people
against them, including some of the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy, and brings
the revolution that much closer. Or you can work to make things better for the
oppressed in the short term. Scott Schultz says this is most of what Kelly is
doing, but I suspect he's satisfied with retaliation too.
Scott also says that Marxism isn't appropriate in a world with the Lords of
Judgement and the Cycle, and I might add that Marxists haven't thought much
about the possibility that a proletariat might be innately inferior in important
ways, such as the Easterners' and Tecklas' lower capacity for sorcery that you
point out. But I suspect that only makes things harder, not impossible. Though
Marxist theorists may have never imagined anything like Dragaera, I speculate
that Steven thinks their theories work even there. If the Cycle stands in the
way, it will be destroyed. (There was a time when it didn't exist, so
presumably there could be a time when it doesn't.) If the Lords of Judgement
stand in the way, they'll lose their power.
I even speculate that Vlad will have an important role in moving the Empire in
that direction.
Jerry Friedman, not a Marxist
More information about the Dragaera
mailing list